New terminological standard for superfunctions.

[tommy1729]

yeah but it does not matter if we solve 

f(2x) = exp(f(x))

or 

g(x+1) = exp(g(x))

essentially those equations are equivalent.
And even though they might not hold everywhere , where they do also transfers when you change one into the other.

Instead of using new names, just write out the equations explicitly.
In particular if we want to publish a readable paper we should define things as clear as possible rather then making up new terminology or symbols.

Unless you find different methods for different solutions of those different morphisms I see no usefulness ?

I might be wrong about those branches ... Not sure what equations were valid there ... Maybe my memory plays tricks on me.

But If I may advertise one of my questions ; special cases of similar functional equations are still unsolved :

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions...ght2-1-fz2

That seems to be within the spirit of these functional equations.

Sorry for being hard on a new valuable member or posting this at the wrong place , but im surprised at such a poll.

regards

tommy1729