Explicit formula for the tetration to base [tex]e^{1/e}[/tex]?
#1
Hi.

I was wondering about this. I saw this:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.4735

made by two forum members here. It gives asymptotic formulae for the tetration and "upper super-exponential" to base \( e^{1/e] \), also called "\( \eta \)".

In particular, the formula is given for the tetration at base \( \eta \) with

\( F(z) = e \left(1 - \frac{2}{z} \left(1 + \sum_{m=1}^{\infty} \frac{P_m(-\log(z))}{(3z)^m}\right)\right) \)

so that \( ^z \eta \) is just a constant shift of this function. I'm not sure if this is a convergent formula or just an asymptotic, as the paper says asymptotic analysis determines the coefficients.

The first few polynomials \( P_n \) are given by

\( P_1(t) = t \)
\( P_2(t) = t^2 + t + 1/2 \)
\( P_3(t) = t^3 + \frac{5}{2}t^2 + \frac{5}{2}t + \frac{7}{10} \)
\( P_4(t) = t^4 + \frac{13}{3}t^3 + \frac{45}{6}t^2 + \frac{53}{10}t + \frac{67}{60} \)
\( P_5(t) = t^5 + \frac{77}{12}t^4 + \frac{101}{6}t^3 + \frac{83}{4}t^2 + \frac{653}{60}t + \frac{2701}{1680} \)

Now, is there some kind of explicit (at least a finite summation/product etc. is what I mean) formula for these polynomials?

Thanks to Richard Stanley on mathoverflow.net here:

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/57627/...lso-how-ca

an explicit formula was found for the polynomial coefficients for the regular iteration at the base \( e \), in particular if

\( F(z+1) = \exp(F(z)) \)

and

\( F(z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n L^{nz} \)

then

\( a_0 = L \)
\( a_1 = 1 \)

and for \( n > 1 \),

\( a_n = \frac{P_n(L)}{\prod_{j=2}^{n} j (L^{j-1} - 1)} \)

where

\( P_n(L) = \sum_{j=0}^{\frac{(n-1)(n-2)}{2}} \mathrm{mag}_{n,j} L^j \)

are polynomials, and the coefficients are given explicitly by

\( \mathrm{mag}_{n, {{n-1} \choose {2}} - j} = \sum_{S} \beta_n(S) \)

where \( S \) ranges over all subsets of \( \{1, 2, \cdots, n-2\} \) such that \( \sum_{s \in S} s = j \). And

\( \beta_n(S) = \sum_{T \subseteq S} (-1)^{|S - T|} \alpha_n(T) \)

where \( \alpha_n(T) \) is given for the given subset \( T \) by ordering its elements in the order \( t_1 < t_2 < \cdots < t_k \), as

\( \alpha_n(T) = \prod_{l=0}^{k-1} S(n - t_l, n - t_{l+1}) \).

where the \( S \)-numbers are just the familiar Stirling second-kind numbers and \( t_0 = 0 \).

So is there an explicit formula for the coefficients, or, perhaps more elegantly, the polynomials (e.g. as sums of multiplied simpler polynomials, for example) in the \( \eta \) tetration? Also, are these formulas of any interest? I don't know if anyone saw them on the MathOverflow site. I'm the original poster of the question linked there, btw.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Explicit formula for the tetration to base [tex]e^{1/e}[/tex]? - by mike3 - 02/12/2015, 10:27 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Mixed-base tetration: five preprints, a faster fatou.gp fork, and a base-change calcu Lightrunner 0 343 07/15/2026, 08:33 AM
Last Post: Lightrunner
  Seeking an arXiv endorser for mixed-base tetration (math.DS) Lightrunner 0 240 07/13/2026, 10:19 PM
Last Post: Lightrunner
  [2sinh] exp(x) - exp( - (e-1) x), Low Base Constant (LBC) 1.5056377.. tommy1729 3 6,770 04/30/2023, 01:22 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  f(x+y) g(f(x)f(y)) = f(x) + f(y) addition formula ? tommy1729 1 3,761 01/13/2023, 08:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Base -1 marraco 15 40,691 07/06/2022, 09:37 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 JmsNxn 9 16,151 06/20/2022, 08:28 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Formula for the Taylor Series for Tetration Catullus 8 15,702 06/12/2022, 07:32 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Big Grin Repetition of the last digits of a tetration of generic base Luknik 12 22,808 12/16/2021, 12:26 AM
Last Post: marcokrt
  On the [tex]2 \pi i[/tex]-periodic solution to tetration, base e JmsNxn 0 3,960 09/28/2021, 05:44 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  A different approach to the base-change method JmsNxn 0 4,322 03/17/2021, 11:15 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)