Theorem in fractional calculus needed for hyperoperators
#5
If its not entire there's no point in doing anything. It doesn't matter, it will be entire for inverse hyp operators.

Constructing b_n from a_n is the goal, I'm trying to think of how to do this. I've made some progress but its very taxing. I've come up with some conditions on how the function g(x) should behave, however, its hard to boil this into how b_n behave. The problem is rather tricky. I have a lot of confidence we can do this though, it will require lots of tricks though.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Theorem in fractional calculus needed for hyperoperators - by JmsNxn - 07/03/2014, 06:13 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Interesting commutative hyperoperators ? tommy1729 3 9,028 12/17/2022, 02:03 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  On my old fractional calculus approach to hyper-operations JmsNxn 14 27,009 07/07/2021, 07:35 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  All Maps Have Flows & All Hyperoperators Operate on Matrices Daniel 0 4,683 03/14/2020, 06:22 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Isomorphism of newtonian calculus rules for Non-Newtonian (anti)derivatives of hypers Micah 4 14,130 03/02/2019, 08:23 PM
Last Post: Micah
  Logic hyperoperators hixidom 0 5,671 10/14/2015, 08:26 PM
Last Post: hixidom
  Negative, Fractional, and Complex Hyperoperations KingDevyn 2 18,851 05/30/2014, 08:19 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  left-right iteraton in right-divisible magmas, and fractional ranks. MphLee 1 9,223 05/14/2014, 03:51 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  A new way of approaching fractional hyper operators JmsNxn 0 8,663 05/26/2012, 06:34 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 65,714 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Hyperoperators [n] basics for large n dyitto 9 30,066 03/12/2011, 10:19 PM
Last Post: dyitto



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)