I assume mike3 meant :
\( \Gamma(\theta(x)) \)
As for the numerical testing , did mike test for x > 0 or x >-2 or a Taylor series at some x ? Or x > some C ?
If his conjecture means for x > -2 then it is quite a strong idea ,
but Im not sure about existance since going from f(-1.9) to f(-0.9) is not likely convex.
SO I assume for x > 0.
Right ?
regards
tommy1729
\( \Gamma(\theta(x)) \)
As for the numerical testing , did mike test for x > 0 or x >-2 or a Taylor series at some x ? Or x > some C ?
If his conjecture means for x > -2 then it is quite a strong idea ,
but Im not sure about existance since going from f(-1.9) to f(-0.9) is not likely convex.
SO I assume for x > 0.
Right ?
regards
tommy1729