A specific value of the Ackermann function
#8
martin Wrote:Oy. This amount in dollars would sure help the world out of its financial crisis.Smile

Unfortunately there can never be so many dollars, because the number is bigger than the number of atoms in the universe. Already the number \( 2^{65536} \) which I gave in my initial post, which is much much much much (its really not expressable how incredibly much) smaller than the number tetrator was seeking is around \( 10^{19728} \), while the number of atoms in the universe (see wikipedia) is around \( 10^{80} \).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
large numbers - by bo198214 - 10/19/2008, 11:56 AM
RE: large numbers - by Finitist - 10/26/2008, 06:49 PM
RE: A specific value of the Ackermann function - by bo198214 - 10/21/2008, 07:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Question for Bo] about formal Ackermann laws MphLee 6 10,937 12/18/2022, 09:14 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  Is successor function analytic? Daniel 6 10,598 11/28/2022, 12:03 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann fixed points Daniel 0 4,428 09/18/2022, 03:13 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  Proof Ackermann function extended to reals cannot be commutative/associative JmsNxn 1 9,795 06/15/2013, 08:02 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 67,723 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Proof Ackermann function cannot have an analytic identity function JmsNxn 0 6,983 11/11/2011, 02:26 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  extension of the Ackermann function to operators less than addition JmsNxn 2 13,049 11/06/2011, 08:06 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Ackermann function and hyper operations andydude 3 18,867 04/18/2011, 05:08 PM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)