06/19/2023, 01:54 AM
(06/18/2023, 11:25 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: I agree with Daniel.
I had similar ideas in the past.
I made a post somewhere I am sure of that.
The thing is this :
If the derivative at the fixpoint has small imaginary value the angular rotation is small.
So if the fixpoint is also far away , combined with bounded angular rotation , we get almost no rotation.
The rotation converges to zero if the distance to the fixpoint converges to infinity and we pick a subset that has small angular rotation ( aka imag part of the derivative ).
So the question is ; is it justified to take that limit ??
Does that converge properly to a unique and analytic function ?
I am not sure any of this or a variant is even justified but it is worth investigating.
regards
tommy1729
I'm first trying to develop a mental picture of the problem so that I have something to look for when I model the problem. Plus we now have Paulsen's JavaScript calculator, which I believe gives valid results for expressions like \(^{.5}2\). Next I need to analyze the values of an expression like \(^{.5}2\) that are associated to the different fixed points.
Daniel