06/18/2023, 11:25 PM
I agree with Daniel.
I had similar ideas in the past.
I made a post somewhere I am sure of that.
The thing is this :
If the derivative at the fixpoint has small imaginary value the angular rotation is small.
So if the fixpoint is also far away , combined with bounded angular rotation , we get almost no rotation.
The rotation converges to zero if the distance to the fixpoint converges to infinity and we pick a subset that has small angular rotation ( aka imag part of the derivative ).
So the question is ; is it justified to take that limit ??
Does that converge properly to a unique and analytic function ?
I am not sure any of this or a variant is even justified but it is worth investigating.
regards
tommy1729
I had similar ideas in the past.
I made a post somewhere I am sure of that.
The thing is this :
If the derivative at the fixpoint has small imaginary value the angular rotation is small.
So if the fixpoint is also far away , combined with bounded angular rotation , we get almost no rotation.
The rotation converges to zero if the distance to the fixpoint converges to infinity and we pick a subset that has small angular rotation ( aka imag part of the derivative ).
So the question is ; is it justified to take that limit ??
Does that converge properly to a unique and analytic function ?
I am not sure any of this or a variant is even justified but it is worth investigating.
regards
tommy1729