E^^.5 and Slog(e,.5)
|
E^^.5 and Slog(e,.5)
|
e^^-.5~.49856.
slog(e,.5)~-.49850. e^^.5+slog(e,.5)~.000064913. Is the closeness between e^^.5 and -slog(e,.5) a coincidence?
Please remember to stay hydrated.
ฅ(ﾐ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ﾐ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\ 
The reason the values are close but opposite is, I guess, because \({\rm slog}\) and \({\rm sexp}\) do are almost symmetrical along the axis \(y=-x\) in a neighborhood of the origin of the x-y plane. Add that to the fact that inverse functions are symmetrical respect to the \(x=y\) axis, and you explain the closeness.
Here's a linear interpolation of the superfunction and abel function https://www.desmos.com/calculator/xsr7yx0wnc MSE MphLee Mother Law \((\sigma+1)0=\sigma (\sigma+1)\) S Law \(\bigcirc_f^{\lambda}\square_f^{\lambda^+}(g)=\square_g^{\lambda}\bigcirc_g^{\lambda^+}(f)\)
07/20/2022, 11:01 AM
Ah, okay.
Please remember to stay hydrated.
ฅ(ﾐ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ﾐ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\
07/20/2022, 03:59 PM
Hey Catullus, I tell you that is clear that you are, also, trying to farm forum stats. Number of posts/threads won't give you any credit, aura or achievement. Farming stats is really easy, but it is easy to spot inside a forum like this one, not very active and mildly moderated and where posts tend to be very technical by nature.
You better go find a forum of casual conversations where it is easy to feel rewarded by farming activity stats, and where number of short interactions actually have value and are satisfying. Something like a social network could work aswell. MSE MphLee Mother Law \((\sigma+1)0=\sigma (\sigma+1)\) S Law \(\bigcirc_f^{\lambda}\square_f^{\lambda^+}(g)=\square_g^{\lambda}\bigcirc_g^{\lambda^+}(f)\) 
Honestly, Mphlee. I think that's incorrect. I think Catullus is genuinely interested in this stuff. And he's playing with Fatou.gp and he has questions. He also seems pretty young. So I think this is natural. I don't think this is nefarious or double edged in anyway. But I see where you are coming from. Honestly reminds me of all the dumb questions I posted here when I was like 16, lmao.
07/21/2022, 11:47 AM
(07/20/2022, 11:59 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: Honestly, Mphlee. I think that's incorrect. I think Catullus is genuinely interested in this stuff. And he's playing with Fatou.gp and he has questions. He also seems pretty young. So I think this is natural. I don't think this is nefarious or double edged in anyway. But I see where you are coming from. Honestly reminds me of all the dumb questions I posted here when I was like 16, lmao. Hi I was not enough clear. I don't know for sure if Catullus is genuinely interested, and I don't think is my problem. I do not think he is here for farming forum stats, I had to be more clear, sorry. Everybody does dumb questions, me too. But I saw as a fact that he is ALSO farming forum stats. I may be wrong.. maybe. I used to be a big forum user so my experience is talking, I see patterns. I'm reading again my post and I think it sounds bad in the last paragraph. Not kind at all. Anyways I do think that he/she can, as everyone can, frequent multiple forums for multiple purposes. My invite is only to be understood in the context of farming forum stats. I'm sure he/she is not here ONLY, or primarily, for farming forum stats. If this was implied by my previous post I apologize. MSE MphLee Mother Law \((\sigma+1)0=\sigma (\sigma+1)\) S Law \(\bigcirc_f^{\lambda}\square_f^{\lambda^+}(g)=\square_g^{\lambda}\bigcirc_g^{\lambda^+}(f)\)
07/22/2022, 01:53 AM
(07/21/2022, 11:47 AM)MphLee Wrote:(07/20/2022, 11:59 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: Honestly, Mphlee. I think that's incorrect. I think Catullus is genuinely interested in this stuff. And he's playing with Fatou.gp and he has questions. He also seems pretty young. So I think this is natural. I don't think this is nefarious or double edged in anyway. But I see where you are coming from. Honestly reminds me of all the dumb questions I posted here when I was like 16, lmao. Lol, trying to get tetration reddit karma, lmao. Never would've thought of that, makes sense though. Ya, I'd chop it up to normal shit you do as a kid. I undertand now.
07/22/2022, 02:20 AM
(07/22/2022, 01:53 AM)JmsNxn Wrote: Ya, I'd chop it up to normal shit you do as a kid.It is, and I did it to...  ... yeah like 20 years ago
MSE MphLee Mother Law \((\sigma+1)0=\sigma (\sigma+1)\) S Law \(\bigcirc_f^{\lambda}\square_f^{\lambda^+}(g)=\square_g^{\lambda}\bigcirc_g^{\lambda^+}(f)\) |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
|
Slog(Exponential Factorial(x)) | Catullus | 19 | 3,415 |
07/13/2022, 02:38 AM Last Post: Catullus |
|
|
Slog(x^^^2) | Catullus | 1 | 545 |
07/10/2022, 04:40 AM Last Post: JmsNxn |
|
|
Slog(e4) | Catullus | 0 | 511 |
06/16/2022, 03:27 AM Last Post: Catullus |
| A support for Andy's (P.Walker's) slog-matrix-method | Gottfried | 4 | 6,561 |
03/08/2021, 07:13 PM Last Post: JmsNxn |
|
| Some slog stuff | tommy1729 | 15 | 29,008 |
05/14/2015, 09:25 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| A limit exercise with Ei and slog. | tommy1729 | 0 | 4,095 |
09/09/2014, 08:00 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| A system of functional equations for slog(x) ? | tommy1729 | 3 | 9,609 |
07/28/2014, 09:16 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| slog(superfactorial(x)) = ? | tommy1729 | 3 | 9,626 |
06/02/2014, 11:29 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| [stuck] On the functional equation of the slog : slog(e^z) = slog(z)+1 | tommy1729 | 1 | 5,377 |
04/28/2014, 09:23 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| A simple yet unsolved equation for slog(z) ? | tommy1729 | 0 | 3,827 |
04/27/2014, 08:02 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
