Stuff Being Added to my Reply

[Catullus]

EDIT: The issue is resolved now. Thank you.
I was writing a reply on Rank-Wise Approximations of hyper operations. (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationfor...6#pid10156) And I tried to write: 

I'm doubtful it'd be possible though, it'd be really cool if it was. The trouble is every tetration induces an iteration, and as I remarked that iterations \(f^{\circ s}(z)\) can't be holomorphic in the neighborhood of two fixed points.

What if the different Schröder iterations flowed together nicely?

. But it came out as: 

I'm doubtful it'd be possible though, it'd be really cool if it was. The trouble is every tetration induces an iteration, and as I remarked that iterations \(f^{\circ s}(z)\) can't be holomorphic in the neighborhood of two fixed points.

What if the different Schröder iterations flowed together nicely?

I'm doubtful it'd be possible though, it'd be really cool if it was. The trouble is every tetration induces an iteration, and as I remarked that iterations \(f^{\circ s}(z)\) can't be holomorphic in the neighborhood of two fixed points.

What if the different Schröder iterations flowed together nicely?

. Why? Why did it copy what I wrote? I tried removing it but it came back. Why did that happen? Part of the post was added automatically.

[JmsNxn]

I was writing a reply on Rank-Wise Approximations of hyper operations. (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationfor...6#pid10156) And I tried to write: 

I'm doubtful it'd be possible though, it'd be really cool if it was. The trouble is every tetration induces an iteration, and as I remarked that iterations \(f^{\circ s}(z)\) can't be holomorphic in the neighborhood of two fixed points.

What if the different Schröder iterations flowed together nicely?

. But it came out as: 

I'm doubtful it'd be possible though, it'd be really cool if it was. The trouble is every tetration induces an iteration, and as I remarked that iterations \(f^{\circ s}(z)\) can't be holomorphic in the neighborhood of two fixed points.

What if the different Schröder iterations flowed together nicely?

I'm doubtful it'd be possible though, it'd be really cool if it was. The trouble is every tetration induces an iteration, and as I remarked that iterations \(f^{\circ s}(z)\) can't be holomorphic in the neighborhood of two fixed points.

What if the different Schröder iterations flowed together nicely?

. Why? Why did it copy what I wrote? I tried removing it but it came back. Why did that happen? Part of the post was added automatically.

Hey, Catullus

Some parts of this forum are a tad wonky. Sometimes it can render the html with some errors. It's not anybody's fault. Don't worry about it, we all get these errors from time to time   I tend to restart the browser and that solves it

[Catullus]

Some parts of this forum are a tad wonky. Sometimes it can render the html with some errors. It's not anybody's fault. Don't worry about it, we all get these errors from time to time   I tend to restart the browser and that solves it

I tried a different browser and it still happened. I tried restarting the browser and it still happened. I tried rebooting the computer and it still happened. Finally it was removed because of the source being edited to remove it. 

[Catullus]

The pixels on the ultra compressed GIF look blurry. Is there any way to fix that?

[bo198214]

I tried a different browser and it still happened. I tried restarting the browser and it still happened. I tried rebooting the computer and it still happened. Finally it was removed because of the source being edited to remove it. 

You mean, you removed your answer, restarted and created a new answer and the same thing happened? But only in this one thread?

[Catullus]

You mean, you removed your answer, restarted and created a new answer and the same thing happened? But only in this one thread?

I tried to edit the reply. I did not create a new reply.

[MphLee]

Idk if this has anything to do with your problem.
I experienced many bugs with the YSWYG preview feature of the "post a new reply/edit" function.
So now, every time I write or edit a post I deactivate it by working all the time in ""View Source (Ctrl+Shift+S)" mode.
If I hit preview of a post I'm writing then I make sure to go back to View Source.
In this way I never had formatting bugs anymore.