(05/13/2022, 03:17 AM)JmsNxn Wrote: Consider a sequence of accumulation points. Then that admits your theory to holomorphy. I mean, assume you have a sequence identified by its accumulation to \(0\), that defines the sheaf at zero.I'm sure I don't understand. Pls, if you see something that seems easily translatable in my language from complex analysis give me pointers. I need to study much more before I can make an attempt at extending my rosetta stone to continuity (topological data) and then smoothness (differential data). And what I'm doing is not much more than compiling this rosetta stone.
Mother Law \(\sigma^+\circ 0=\sigma \circ \sigma^+ \)
\({\rm Grp}_{\rm pt} ({\rm RK}J,G)\cong \mathbb N{\rm Set}_{\rm pt} (J, \Sigma^G)\)
