1. ok, I think I should be more concerned about what's happening in this area beta method:
2. If a base happens to be in the S-T region, then,
I can't understand why you wrote Is_Shell_Thron() in such a complicated way...
3. I think the most surprising fact about "recover kneser" is that the beta method works fine when the base is very close to 1, or even equal to 1. Fatou.gp is very poor at this problem. (and \( e^{-e} < b < 1 \) )
4. I'm just worried that there are dynamics on the inverse function that we don't understand yet, and that it would be best to perform a check if the numerical approximation is easy.
In contrast we always do not understand the dynamics and numerical computation of Tetration's indefinite integral, but the \( \int\beta \) doesn't look so bad
2. If a base happens to be in the S-T region, then,
Code:
u = exp(2*Pi*I/period);
t = exp(u);
base = exp(u/t);I can't understand why you wrote Is_Shell_Thron() in such a complicated way...
3. I think the most surprising fact about "recover kneser" is that the beta method works fine when the base is very close to 1, or even equal to 1. Fatou.gp is very poor at this problem. (and \( e^{-e} < b < 1 \) )
4. I'm just worried that there are dynamics on the inverse function that we don't understand yet, and that it would be best to perform a check if the numerical approximation is easy.
In contrast we always do not understand the dynamics and numerical computation of Tetration's indefinite integral, but the \( \int\beta \) doesn't look so bad
