10/02/2021, 01:40 PM
After a few days of work (more on fixing bugs in my own drawing program) I got these high value images.
I am now starting to believe that "James' beta method" really shows the truth about "Tetrationess".
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1...sp=sharing
The plotted objective function is beta(z,1), and the gray inside the plot indicates Overflow/Underflow
base = e^-e. A very familiar graphic pattern appears here, which is a very good sign!
![[Image: 1tuj_aeEG59EoQHumBGd6jq0Oa1US8OAI]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/u/0/d/1tuj_aeEG59EoQHumBGd6jq0Oa1US8OAI)
base = 10^-5.
![[Image: 1mkbbRVsCFQn2dxF115tWKBuV9kAz8wa3]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/u/0/d/1mkbbRVsCFQn2dxF115tWKBuV9kAz8wa3)
You can see the "fusion" between function branches here.
![[Image: 1b4qTls3vSeOkahKCasCXAVNx4Lpa6xfH]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/u/0/d/1b4qTls3vSeOkahKCasCXAVNx4Lpa6xfH)
base = 10^5. There is an old rumor on the forum that claims that when base -> ∞, there is also some stable Tetrationess behavior.
![[Image: 1jvix7ge5vn7i_STGvPeRWF_rEJ0jBdN5]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/u/0/d/1jvix7ge5vn7i_STGvPeRWF_rEJ0jBdN5)
base=-99999, Because I was too sleepy I didn't check the product of the input command
![[Image: 1IaVb7pzx4S3pSrDAHY5FRlq3nQncQcQH]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/u/0/d/1IaVb7pzx4S3pSrDAHY5FRlq3nQncQcQH)
You can also see the behavior of the "half-cycle" function similar to base=1E5.
It is worth noting that the base=-1, -1E-5 program cannot calculate
base=1+1E-5, 1-1E-5, 0.5, E^E^-1 nothing special, you can see for yourself in the google drive.
I am now starting to believe that "James' beta method" really shows the truth about "Tetrationess".
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1...sp=sharing
The plotted objective function is beta(z,1), and the gray inside the plot indicates Overflow/Underflow
base = e^-e. A very familiar graphic pattern appears here, which is a very good sign!
base = 10^-5.
You can see the "fusion" between function branches here.
base = 10^5. There is an old rumor on the forum that claims that when base -> ∞, there is also some stable Tetrationess behavior.
base=-99999, Because I was too sleepy I didn't check the product of the input command
You can also see the behavior of the "half-cycle" function similar to base=1E5.
It is worth noting that the base=-1, -1E-5 program cannot calculate
base=1+1E-5, 1-1E-5, 0.5, E^E^-1 nothing special, you can see for yourself in the google drive.

