07/21/2021, 05:48 PM
That seems correct and logical (imo).
Originally I considered taking the lambertW function for approximations.
Not sure if that still relates much.
However a tiny remark.
division by tet(s) is not necc small , even for Re(s) large ; because tet(s) can be close to 0 !
This (chaos) complicates matters , despite perhaps still true ... not so trivially ...
regards
tommy1729
Originally I considered taking the lambertW function for approximations.
Not sure if that still relates much.
However a tiny remark.
division by tet(s) is not necc small , even for Re(s) large ; because tet(s) can be close to 0 !
This (chaos) complicates matters , despite perhaps still true ... not so trivially ...
regards
tommy1729

