I have another strange, but again very basic result for the alternating series of powertowers of increasing height (I call it Tetra-series, see also my first conjecture at alternating tetra-series )
Assume a base "b", and then the alternating series
and for a single term, with h for the integer height (which may also be negative)
which -if h is negative- actually means (where lb(x) = log(x)/log(b) )
My first result was, that these series have "small" values and can be summed even if b>e^(1/e) (which is not possible with conventional summation methods). For the usual convergent case e^(-e)<b<e^(1/e) the results can be checked by Euler-summation and they agree perfectly with the results obtained by my matrix-method.(see image below)
Now if I extend the series Sb(x) to the left, using lb(x) = log(x)/log(b) for log(x) to base b, then define
This may be computed by the analoguous formula above to that for Mb from the inverse of Bb:
I get for the sum of both by my matrix-method
or, and this looks even more strange (but even more basic)
x cannot assume the value 1, 0 or any integral height of the powertower b^b^b... since at a certain position we have then a term lb(0), which introduces a singularity.
Using the Tb()-notation for shortness, then the result is
\( \hspace{24}
0 = \sum_{h=-\infty}^{+\infty} T_b(x,h)
\)
and is a very interesting one for any tetration-dedicated...
Gottfried
An older plot; I used AS(s) with x=1,s=b for Sb(x) there.
(a bigger one AS
Assume a base "b", and then the alternating series
Code:
.
Sb(x) = x - b^x + b^b^x - b^b^b^x +... - ...and for a single term, with h for the integer height (which may also be negative)
Code:
.
Tb(x,h) = b^b^b^...^x \\ b occurs h-timeswhich -if h is negative- actually means (where lb(x) = log(x)/log(b) )
Code:
.
Tb(x,-h) = lb(lb(...(lb(x))...) \\ lb occurs h-times-------------------------------------------------------
My first result was, that these series have "small" values and can be summed even if b>e^(1/e) (which is not possible with conventional summation methods). For the usual convergent case e^(-e)<b<e^(1/e) the results can be checked by Euler-summation and they agree perfectly with the results obtained by my matrix-method.(see image below)
Code:
matrix-notation
Sb(x) = (V(x)~ * (I - Bb + Bb^2 - Bb^3 + ... - ...) )[,1]
= (V(x)~ * (I + Bb)^-1 ) [,1]
= V(x)~ * Mb[,1] \\ (at least) for all b>1
= sum r=0..inf x^r * mb[r,1]
serial notation
= sum h=0..inf (-1)^h* Tb(x,h) \\ only possible for e^(-e) < b < e^(1/e)
\\ Euler-summation required-------------------------------------------------------
Now if I extend the series Sb(x) to the left, using lb(x) = log(x)/log(b) for log(x) to base b, then define
Code:
.
Rb(x) = x - lb(x) + lb(lb(x) - lb(lb(lb(x))) +... - ...This may be computed by the analoguous formula above to that for Mb from the inverse of Bb:
Code:
.
Lb = (I + Bb^-1)^-1I get for the sum of both by my matrix-method
Code:
.
Sb(x) + Rb(x) = V(x)~ *Mb[,1] + V(x)~ * Lb[,1]
= V(x)~ * (Mb + Lb)[,1]
= V(x)~ * I [,1]
= V(x)~ * [0,1,0,0,...]~
= x
Sb(x) + Rb(x) = xCode:
.
0 = ... lb(lb(x)) - lb(x) + x - b^x + b^b^x - ... + ...x cannot assume the value 1, 0 or any integral height of the powertower b^b^b... since at a certain position we have then a term lb(0), which introduces a singularity.
Using the Tb()-notation for shortness, then the result is
\( \hspace{24}
0 = \sum_{h=-\infty}^{+\infty} T_b(x,h)
\)
and is a very interesting one for any tetration-dedicated...
Gottfried
-------------------------------------------------------
An older plot; I used AS(s) with x=1,s=b for Sb(x) there.
(a bigger one AS
Gottfried Helms, Kassel

