introducing TPID 16
|
introducing TPID 16
|
06/09/2014, 09:55 AM
(06/08/2014, 04:05 PM)sheldonison Wrote: One other problem is that the "otherwise" statement here is identical to the then statement. No. Larger or equal than 0 =/= larger than 0. ( for x) You are mistaken. Even if I shake ideas out of my sleeve I usually know what Im doing. I was aware of Jay's observation. regards tommy1729 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/07/2014, 11:03 PM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by sheldonison - 06/08/2014, 04:05 PM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/09/2014, 09:55 AM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/18/2014, 11:36 PM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/18/2014, 11:46 PM
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| RED ALERT : TPID CONJECTURES GONE ??? | tommy1729 | 4 | 6,323 |
08/12/2022, 10:08 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
|
TPID 6 | Catullus | 1 | 3,078 |
07/04/2022, 12:55 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
| TPID 4 | tommy1729 | 30 | 87,148 |
06/18/2022, 10:40 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) | tommy1729 | 0 | 6,059 |
09/06/2016, 04:23 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| Flexible etas and eulers ? TPID 10 | tommy1729 | 0 | 5,284 |
08/19/2016, 12:09 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| (almost) proof of TPID 13 | fivexthethird | 1 | 8,897 |
05/06/2016, 04:12 PM Last Post: JmsNxn |
|
| Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) | tommy1729 | 2 | 12,441 |
01/10/2016, 06:14 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| TPID 8 | tommy1729 | 0 | 6,045 |
04/04/2011, 10:45 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
| Discussion of TPID 6 | JJacquelin | 3 | 16,053 |
10/24/2010, 07:44 AM Last Post: bo198214 |
|
| Another proof of TPID 6 | tommy1729 | 0 | 5,998 |
07/25/2010, 11:51 PM Last Post: tommy1729 |
|
