06/04/2014, 10:14 PM
There is a problem with this particular type of fake function.
Although it may be fixed as stated in post 1 it seems a big problem.
Perhaps the biggest problem of " fake function theory ".
id(x) as desired in post nr 1 : " fake id(x) behaves like e/2 x for small x, like x for large real and like 0 for large imaginary part "
is in contradiction with the well known Lindelöf theorem.
It seems the natural fix is : " fake id(z) behaves like e/2 z for small z and like z for large z "
regards
tommy1729
Although it may be fixed as stated in post 1 it seems a big problem.
Perhaps the biggest problem of " fake function theory ".
id(x) as desired in post nr 1 : " fake id(x) behaves like e/2 x for small x, like x for large real and like 0 for large imaginary part "
is in contradiction with the well known Lindelöf theorem.
It seems the natural fix is : " fake id(z) behaves like e/2 z for small z and like z for large z "
regards
tommy1729

