04/30/2013, 11:03 PM
Does everyone agree on equation 31 ?
In particular the * ln(b)^x * part ?
I do not know what " lin " is suppose to mean.
Those are my biggest concerns together with the possibility that there has already been a post proving the same thing.
Maybe the *ln(b)^x* is only true for some solutions to tetration , suggesting that this assumes such a solution. But I may be wrong.
Taking things ' x times ' is controversial.
regards
tommy1729
In particular the * ln(b)^x * part ?
I do not know what " lin " is suppose to mean.
Those are my biggest concerns together with the possibility that there has already been a post proving the same thing.
Maybe the *ln(b)^x* is only true for some solutions to tetration , suggesting that this assumes such a solution. But I may be wrong.
Taking things ' x times ' is controversial.
regards
tommy1729