+- Tetration Forum (https://tetrationforum.org)
+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://tetrationforum.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: derive of sexp_x(x) (/showthread.php?tid=789)
derive of sexp_x(x) - Nasser - 04/28/2013
Hi
few months ago ,I wrote a paper on "derive of sexp_x(x) and others" although this derive does not exist until now but I still not sure of publishing my paper because I am amateur mathematican just studying tetration as a hoppy and I have many things I am not clear about ,so I need your help , should I submit it to a publisher magazine or upload it here first to discuss it with you for evaluating.
Please advice me
Nasser Dawood
RE: derive of sexp_x(x) - tommy1729 - 04/29/2013
Where is the paper ?
Also if you are not a mathematician how are you going to publish ?
regards
tommy1729
RE: derive of sexp_x(x) - Nasser - 04/30/2013
(04/29/2013, 10:28 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: Where is the paper ?Hi tommy1729
Also if you are not a mathematician how are you going to publish ?
Here is the paper
in the attachment
or from depositefile uploading website
derive of sexp_x(x)
rar password = tetra
some magazines does not provide mathematician publishers, they just evaluate the content of the paper or research.
RE: derive of sexp_x(x) - tommy1729 - 04/30/2013
Does everyone agree on equation 31 ?
In particular the * ln(b)^x * part ?
I do not know what " lin " is suppose to mean.
Those are my biggest concerns together with the possibility that there has already been a post proving the same thing.
Maybe the *ln(b)^x* is only true for some solutions to tetration , suggesting that this assumes such a solution. But I may be wrong.
Taking things ' x times ' is controversial.
regards
tommy1729
RE: derive of sexp_x(x) - tommy1729 - 04/30/2013
Its just that using the chain rule for differentiation , I seem to get ln(b)^floor(x) or did I make a mistake there ?
regards
tommy1729
RE: derive of sexp_x(x) - Nasser - 05/08/2013
You can download the last updated paper from the following link
http://vixra.org/abs/1305.0040
(Please replace the attachment with the updated one.)
On equation No. 31, it is the same derive result in the floowing reference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MathFacts/Tetration_Summary
check "Differentiation rules" part in the above link.
they are almost the same including the part * ln(b)^x *.
but the deffrence is in a concluded result in the paper,see page No. 11.
my problem is that to ensure that "x times" is correct for any real number, although we already know that it is correct for all integers.
regards
Nasser