holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators
#11
that proof of convergeance seems valid.

( and used 1/n^2 as i expected )

congrats !

im not sure if we have differentiability though ...

if we do im betting on uniqueness.

i think we will get closer to an answer of uniqueness if we find a good solution. ( differentiable or not )

regards

tommy1729

ps : off topic , but im sick Sad

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by tommy1729 - 08/06/2012, 03:32 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How could we define negative hyper operators? Shanghai46 2 6,250 11/27/2022, 05:46 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Base Pi Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 7,212 11/08/2022, 06:51 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Hyper-Operational Salad Numbers Catullus 9 14,334 09/17/2022, 01:15 AM
Last Post: Catullus
Question Rank-Wise Approximations of Hyper-Operations Catullus 48 69,395 09/08/2022, 02:52 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  "circular" operators, "circular" derivatives, and "circular" tetration. JmsNxn 15 33,504 07/29/2022, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The modified Bennet Operators, and their Abel functions JmsNxn 6 10,287 07/22/2022, 12:55 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The \(\varphi\) method of semi operators, the first half of my research JmsNxn 13 18,898 07/17/2022, 05:42 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Octonion Hyper-Operations Catullus 3 6,391 07/05/2022, 08:53 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 13,508 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 4 16,434 06/29/2022, 11:46 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)