11/21/2011, 08:08 PM
(11/20/2011, 09:26 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: This definition cannot fall victim to the method of disproof Tommy gave forth because the transformation notation takes three arguments whereas the diamond notation only takes two.
do not underestimate my powers.
a simple example :
f3 is super of f2 , f2 is super of f1 , f1 is super of f0.
f0(x) = x + e
f1(x) = e*x
f2(x) = exp(x)
f3(x) = sexp(x)
can you generate this sequence with your method ?
every intuitive solutions seems to be different , but only a few can exist.
it is unclear to me how to use carleman matrices - although i mentioned it myself - or anything else ...
i dont even have the impression anyone came close.
and btw general group theory is not necc limited by amount of variables or operations.
we have to be carefull with intuition in mathematics.
regards
tommy1729