i always supported gottried both in this forum and in sci.math.
"!!" does not mean im yelling , loud , "defocusing, obfuscating and distracting behave" ," alarming the world " or not thinking in the correct way.
describing me like that is not very flattering.
the " fights " i had were usually caused by other people being oversensitive or belittling and insulting me.
and often dishonest ppl as one can witness here on the wiki-discussion ( i gave evidence ).
i remember being at sci.math
if i gave a proof , it was called either trivial or unclear.
if i had an idea , it was called stupid.
if i had a conjecture , it was called useless.
if i posted about numbertheory or tetration i got either ignored or insulted.
not to mention posters like musatov , inverse19 or neilist.
i even got into fights about spelling , they then would insult me and stalk me in the new threads that followed.
some ppl pointed out some mistakes i made , but could not handle it if i pointed out theirs.
and worse , those nonflattering things always occur up first on search engines rather than mathematics.
every long thread on sci.math has fights !
every short thread is somewhat ignored !
all i intended to do on wiki is add my 2sinh method.
one can argue that others ppl method deserves to be on that page too.
but i dont prevent or disagree with that.
( i tried to modify other pages too , similar fights )
i was dissapointed by wiki and sci.math so i came to this forum WHERE I BELONG.
i respect everyone and get some respect back.
judging me on sci.math is silly , most of those ppl would not even exist on a MODERATED FORUM for obvious reasons.
if you are angry at someone just because he had a few fights on sci.math WAY BACK IN 2007 WITH OTHER PPL (!) or if he mentions DETERMINANTS WICH ARE ALWAYS RELEVANT IN MATRIX DISCUSSIONS , i find that somewhat ... emotionally unstable.
going back to 2007 is imho far fetched.
i never had a fight with you on sci.math and im pretty sure that if your already offended with in your opinion unrelated determinants , then -by god - the name-calling i had to read in sci.math would have upset you too ! ... you already admitted you dont like sci.math behaviour btw.
i hope you are not suggesting that all fights on sci.math were my own responsibility ?
some ppl actually left sci.math because they disagreed with the way posters replied to me.
( e.g. galathaea )
i dont know what sci.math has to do with this forum anyways.
i havent had any fight in this forum since i registered in may 2009 , you had to look in 2007 or longer ago in sci.math.
the fact that i did not have any fights since may 2009 shows that , when surrounded by polite ppl rather then sci.math ppl , i am myself polite and getting along with all of you.
i wished you good health when you were ill and i invited you ( all members ) to a tetration meeting at my expense and welcomed you back after your absense.
maybe you were frustrated about me saying things without formal proof , but lets face it , there are many things about tetration that have no formal proof yet and not every post contains a proof to say the least.
you can disagree with my view about determinant but i see no reason to fight.
and i certainly did not start a fight by mentioning determinant , i was trying to help !
im kind a dissapointed that after all those years , you act like this.
thanks a lot
tommy1729
edit : have to say that some ppl on sci.math are ( most of the time ) polite helpfull mathematicians , in particular robert israel.
"!!" does not mean im yelling , loud , "defocusing, obfuscating and distracting behave" ," alarming the world " or not thinking in the correct way.
describing me like that is not very flattering.
the " fights " i had were usually caused by other people being oversensitive or belittling and insulting me.
and often dishonest ppl as one can witness here on the wiki-discussion ( i gave evidence ).
i remember being at sci.math
if i gave a proof , it was called either trivial or unclear.
if i had an idea , it was called stupid.
if i had a conjecture , it was called useless.
if i posted about numbertheory or tetration i got either ignored or insulted.
not to mention posters like musatov , inverse19 or neilist.
i even got into fights about spelling , they then would insult me and stalk me in the new threads that followed.
some ppl pointed out some mistakes i made , but could not handle it if i pointed out theirs.
and worse , those nonflattering things always occur up first on search engines rather than mathematics.
every long thread on sci.math has fights !
every short thread is somewhat ignored !
all i intended to do on wiki is add my 2sinh method.
one can argue that others ppl method deserves to be on that page too.
but i dont prevent or disagree with that.
( i tried to modify other pages too , similar fights )
i was dissapointed by wiki and sci.math so i came to this forum WHERE I BELONG.
i respect everyone and get some respect back.
judging me on sci.math is silly , most of those ppl would not even exist on a MODERATED FORUM for obvious reasons.
if you are angry at someone just because he had a few fights on sci.math WAY BACK IN 2007 WITH OTHER PPL (!) or if he mentions DETERMINANTS WICH ARE ALWAYS RELEVANT IN MATRIX DISCUSSIONS , i find that somewhat ... emotionally unstable.
going back to 2007 is imho far fetched.
i never had a fight with you on sci.math and im pretty sure that if your already offended with in your opinion unrelated determinants , then -by god - the name-calling i had to read in sci.math would have upset you too ! ... you already admitted you dont like sci.math behaviour btw.
i hope you are not suggesting that all fights on sci.math were my own responsibility ?
some ppl actually left sci.math because they disagreed with the way posters replied to me.
( e.g. galathaea )
i dont know what sci.math has to do with this forum anyways.
i havent had any fight in this forum since i registered in may 2009 , you had to look in 2007 or longer ago in sci.math.
the fact that i did not have any fights since may 2009 shows that , when surrounded by polite ppl rather then sci.math ppl , i am myself polite and getting along with all of you.
i wished you good health when you were ill and i invited you ( all members ) to a tetration meeting at my expense and welcomed you back after your absense.
maybe you were frustrated about me saying things without formal proof , but lets face it , there are many things about tetration that have no formal proof yet and not every post contains a proof to say the least.
you can disagree with my view about determinant but i see no reason to fight.
and i certainly did not start a fight by mentioning determinant , i was trying to help !
im kind a dissapointed that after all those years , you act like this.
thanks a lot
tommy1729
edit : have to say that some ppl on sci.math are ( most of the time ) polite helpfull mathematicians , in particular robert israel.