Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp
#22
(04/14/2011, 11:16 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: I think the easiest proof is

\( f(x^y) = f(x)f(y) = f(y^x) \)

which can only be true for a constant function.

But this would need a bit more explanation *why* constancy follows from that. And then its not that short anymore Wink

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - by bo198214 - 04/15/2011, 07:29 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The modified Bennet Operators, and their Abel functions JmsNxn 6 10,188 07/22/2022, 12:55 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  the inverse ackerman functions JmsNxn 3 16,703 09/18/2016, 11:02 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 63,921 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Would there be new insights if hyperops are extended to functions? Ivars 2 11,896 05/12/2008, 09:41 AM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)