Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp
#21
I think the easiest proof is

\( f(x^y) = f(x)f(y) = f(y^x) \)

which can only be true for a constant function.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - by JmsNxn - 04/14/2011, 11:16 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The modified Bennet Operators, and their Abel functions JmsNxn 6 10,216 07/22/2022, 12:55 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  the inverse ackerman functions JmsNxn 3 16,713 09/18/2016, 11:02 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 63,941 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Would there be new insights if hyperops are extended to functions? Ivars 2 11,908 05/12/2008, 09:41 AM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)