On the existence of rational operators
#13
I have a discovery that starts to legitimize logarithmic semi-operator calculus.

given:
q:d/dx f(x) = lim h->S(-q) [f(x{-q}h) }-q{ f(x)] }1-q{ h

I can prove that

q:d/dx e^x = e^x

or that if we lower the operators involved in the difference quotient by any value 0 <= q < 1; and change h's limit from zero (the additive identity) to S(-q) (the lowered additive identity), e^x is still it's own output.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: On the existence of rational operators - by JmsNxn - 03/19/2011, 05:36 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How could we define negative hyper operators? Shanghai46 2 6,252 11/27/2022, 05:46 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  "circular" operators, "circular" derivatives, and "circular" tetration. JmsNxn 15 33,508 07/29/2022, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The modified Bennet Operators, and their Abel functions JmsNxn 6 10,291 07/22/2022, 12:55 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The \(\varphi\) method of semi operators, the first half of my research JmsNxn 13 18,902 07/17/2022, 05:42 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 4 13,509 06/30/2022, 11:41 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 4 16,443 06/29/2022, 11:46 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Holomorphic semi operators, using the beta method JmsNxn 71 86,244 06/13/2022, 08:33 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 19,882 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 6,737 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved JmsNxn 30 120,913 09/02/2016, 02:11 AM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)