A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents
#1
I believe I have found a definition for rational hyperexponents which is totally consistent with the notion of the tetraroot.

Details here.

The computation of this function is very demanding (often exceeding the capabilities of Maple) and I am not sure whether it is even continuous, but some crude tests suggest that it is.

I will be leaving for vacations in a few days (but will have net access), and may try to calculate the values of the function \( {^{m/100}}e \) for \( m\in \{1,2,...99\} \) to get a better feel of how this function behaves.

Cheerio.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents - by UVIR - 09/29/2007, 11:56 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A very special set of tetration bases marcokrt 3 5,995 03/14/2026, 01:43 PM
Last Post: marcokrt
  extending normal tetration to real numbers using product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 946 12/12/2025, 07:49 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Tetration with complex bases TetrationSheep 0 768 11/13/2025, 10:33 AM
Last Post: TetrationSheep
  i have a seemingly reasonable definition for tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 900 10/19/2025, 04:00 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,231 09/24/2025, 12:47 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Fractional tetration method Koha 2 6,123 06/05/2025, 01:40 AM
Last Post: Pentalogue
Question Tetration using the integral Pentalogue 0 4,288 05/27/2025, 11:27 PM
Last Post: Pentalogue
  Not about tetration but what do you think about this paper? Ansus 4 6,001 04/12/2025, 07:32 AM
Last Post: Ansus
  A question about tetration from a newbie TetrationSheep 2 6,321 08/26/2024, 12:38 PM
Last Post: TetrationSheep
  Two types of tetration : sexp ' > or < 1. tommy1729 3 8,036 10/17/2023, 12:06 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)