Theory about tetrating bases from 0 to e^-e via the continuum sum
#8
(12/20/2009, 06:27 AM)Ansus Wrote: Did you try Mueller formula with conventional bases 1<b<e^(1/e) ?

Yes. It converges to a value that looks to agree with the regular iteration at the attracting fixpoint, though the convergence (of the iterating method) is really slow at \( b = e^{1/e} \). But the upshot, however, is that it doesn't seem to have as strongly escalating precision requirements using the regular iteration limit formula does.

For Mueller's formula with a fixed point we have

\( \sum_{n=0}^{z-1} f(n) = zL + f(0) + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(n) - f(n + z - 1) \)

where \( \lim_{z \rightarrow \infty} f(z) = L \) in the right halfplane. This allows us to run the tetration for those bases via a Taylor series expanded at \( z = 0 \). For computation, I compute \( f(n + z - 1) \) recursively by power series exponential.

Using 64 terms of power series, 38 digits of precision, Mueller sum up to 256 terms, and 128 iterations starting with an initial guess on the series of 1, I get \( ^{1/2} \sqrt{2} \approx 1.24362162766852180429 \) (I discard the rest of the digits beyond where the residual (difference between \( \sqrt{2}^{F(-0.5)} \) and \( F(0.5) \)) is of order of the first discarded digit. The residual gives an idea of the accuracy of the approximation.). Bumping the power series term count up to 128 terms yet with no further increase of the numerical precision yields \( ^{1/2} \sqrt{2} \approx 1.2436216276685218042950989836094029317 \), which agrees completely with the regular iteration limit formula when rounded to 38 digits of precision, suggesting that the regular iteration and Mueller sum approaches yield the same function. And the best part about this that it looks more efficient for computation. Namely, it gives us a Taylor expansion we can reuse (so that once we "initialize", we can do any real height without so many expensive computations), and it requires no increase in precision beyond the level we need (I think even the series formula for regular iteration requires ever more "slop" precision like the limit formula does.).

And if you want a graph...
   
(that is \( y = {}^{x} \sqrt{2} \) obtained from the Mueller-summed continuum sum formula)
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A very special set of tetration bases marcokrt 3 5,944 03/14/2026, 01:43 PM
Last Post: marcokrt
  Tetration with complex bases TetrationSheep 0 746 11/13/2025, 10:33 AM
Last Post: TetrationSheep
  [UFO] "commutative number theory " f(g) = g(f) tommy1729 0 2,322 03/24/2023, 11:36 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  double functional equation , continuum sum and analytic continuation tommy1729 6 9,716 03/05/2023, 12:36 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Another way to continuum sum! JmsNxn 8 25,120 02/08/2023, 03:49 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  geometric function theory ideas tommy1729 0 2,878 12/31/2022, 12:19 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question Convergent Complex Tetration Bases With the Most and Least Imaginary Parts Catullus 0 2,810 07/10/2022, 06:22 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  Tetration extension for bases between 1 and eta dantheman163 23 65,445 07/05/2022, 04:10 PM
Last Post: Leo.W
  " x-theory " tommy1729 1 3,920 08/12/2021, 12:17 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Dynamical Systems and Number Theory Daniel 4 9,350 06/01/2021, 11:34 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)