(11/08/2009, 08:25 PM)mike3 Wrote: And \( g^{\circ t}_n \) are the same g-coefficients as what are in the paper?
yes.
(11/08/2009, 08:27 PM)mike3 Wrote: You sure that's actually the regular tetration \( ^{y} x \) against x or against the fixed point? Because the graph's x-coordinate looks to go way past \( e^{1/e} \) if that scale is right.
No, thats this damn sage scale. As I wrote the x-axis starts at 1 (so does the y-axis). 1.22 is roughly the middle of \( 1.44 \approx e^{1/e} \). But sage just doesnt get it managed that at least two numbers are shown at every axis, sometimes there is not even one number at the scale.
