Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function)
#13
(08/15/2009, 06:40 PM)jaydfox Wrote: Now this approach only got us the "closest" singularity to whatever point on the real line we started at (0 in my example). Instead of a quarter circle, we can do a 3/4 circle, 5/4 circle, etc., and we can pick different k values in the (2k+1)*pi*i formula, to find arbitrarily many singularities, and depending on the exact path being used, we can find these singularities in arbitrarily many different branches.

I will draw up some pictures do demonstrate.
Alas, I'm at home and don't have access to a math library. When I'm at home, I typically go to www.sagenb.org. By the way, I recommend it to anyone who wants quick access to a powerful library!

However, sagenb.org appears to be having problems, as the SAGE libraries aren't loading. Pictures might have to wait until Monday.

Anyway, it occurs to me that for n>=4, we can create a very nice "grid" of singularities, in the exp^[n-4](x) image.

Simply pick all the points whose real part is equal to log((2k+1)*pi), k a non-negative integer, and whose imaginary part is equal to (2m+1)/2*pi, for m an integer.

Exponentiating once will get you to +/- (2k+1)*pi*i, which exponentiating again will get you to -1.

Note that this grid of points covers the entire right half of the complex plane, so that when we iteratively perform logarithms, we can always find points close to the real line.

As n goes to 5, 6, etc., with each logarithm, we get a strip of points between -pi*i and pi*i, and if we use other branches, we can always keep the complex plane filled with points that will be singularities.

These are what I would call the "trivial" singularities, because they are singularities, no matter what branch of the logarithm of eta we use.

The non-trivial singularities are the ones Henryk pointed out, where we get eta, eta^eta, etc., but only in the primary branch of the logarithm of eta! This is not so easy a feat to accomplish as n gets very large, because we have to wind in and around singularities to make sure we are in the primary branch of the logarithm of base eta.
~ Jay Daniel Fox
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/15/2009, 07:13 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  extending normal tetration to real numbers using product tetration Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,015 12/12/2025, 07:49 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Tetration with complex bases TetrationSheep 0 825 11/13/2025, 10:33 AM
Last Post: TetrationSheep
  my proposed extension of the fast growing hierarchy to real numbers Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,380 09/28/2025, 07:15 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  Behaviour of tetration into the real negatives Shanghai46 1 6,479 03/24/2025, 12:34 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  X-th iteration where x is a real number Natsugou 1 5,763 10/27/2024, 11:23 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Is there any ways to compute iterations of a oscillating function ? Shanghai46 3 7,963 10/15/2023, 11:21 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real tetration as a limit of complex tetration Daniel 5 9,676 06/20/2023, 07:52 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Anyone have any ideas on how to generate this function? JmsNxn 3 5,197 05/21/2023, 03:30 PM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  [2sinh] exp(x) - exp( - (e-1) x), Low Base Constant (LBC) 1.5056377.. tommy1729 3 5,961 04/30/2023, 01:22 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real and complex tetration Daniel 13 17,571 04/04/2023, 10:25 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)