changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation)
#41
(08/13/2009, 11:20 AM)bo198214 Wrote: So then the terms super-exponential, super-logarithm and superfunction would still be in effect (?).

Yes. I think so. Just because there are systematic names the superfunctions and their inverses, doesn't mean existing terms stop being used. The term "superlogarithm" and exponential-logarithm are synonyms now (I also support "tetralogarithm" but have been using "superlogarithm" to distinguish from the 4th polylogarithm). Also, take ethylene for example, its systematic name is "ethene" but no respectable chemist uses the systematic name.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation) - by andydude - 08/13/2009, 07:53 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Not about tetration but what do you think about this paper? Ansus 4 7,425 04/12/2025, 07:32 AM
Last Post: Ansus
  An old paper I did, I think deserves its own thread JmsNxn 4 8,152 12/30/2022, 11:39 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Sat March 6th second Tetration mtg; Peter Walker's 1991 paper sheldonison 13 26,032 03/07/2021, 08:30 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The second iteration of my most recent paper JmsNxn 3 8,300 02/07/2021, 11:11 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Are there any reputable sources verifying terminology? Chenjesu 0 5,846 08/09/2018, 08:20 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Old Research Paper andydude 3 14,254 01/24/2018, 04:12 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Poll: revised super terminology poll Base-Acid Tetration 8 30,606 08/23/2009, 12:26 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  overview paper co-author invitation bo198214 20 84,901 08/12/2009, 07:00 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  fractional powers of function inversion (was: changing terminology) Base-Acid Tetration 5 24,619 08/11/2009, 01:26 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Paper with iteration intro andydude 4 19,116 05/13/2009, 07:53 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)