changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation)

[bo198214]

OK, so lets take a poll (all entries are short terms for the forms: superfunction of \( f \), Abel function of \( f \)):

1. \( f \)-exponential, \( f \)-logarithm
   
2. super-\( f \), sub-\( f \) (with recognized misuse of "sub")
   
3. super-\( f \), Abel-\( f \) (with recognized ambiguity of "super")
   
4. iter-\( f \), Abel-\( f \) (sorry about the Fatou joke)
   
5. iter-\( f \), itra-\( f \) (by analogy to "inter" and "intra")
   
6. ultra-\( f \), infra-\( f \)
   
7. meta-\( f \), para-\( f \)
   

Haha, you are biased! Where is the arcsuper-f???
And do you honestly want to keep e.g. Abel-exponential as an option?
And a secret poll would also more democratic.
I also throw "antisuper-f" into the round!