Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp
#13
Sorry, but I dont see any meaning for hyper operations in defining a fucked up function that is so crude that you can not define them on the reals.

That may be an interestic topic for itself but then rather goes in the direction of Cantor sets or general topology. Good luck.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - by bo198214 - 06/03/2008, 05:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The modified Bennet Operators, and their Abel functions JmsNxn 6 10,216 07/22/2022, 12:55 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  the inverse ackerman functions JmsNxn 3 16,713 09/18/2016, 11:02 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 63,941 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Would there be new insights if hyperops are extended to functions? Ivars 2 11,910 05/12/2008, 09:41 AM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)