Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp
#11
Ivars Wrote:No, for all real points \( x_0 \).

Such a function can not exist. If \( \lim_{x\uparrow x_0}f(x)=0 \) then there must exist a \( \delta>0 \) such that \( f(x)=0 \) for all \( x_0-\delta<x<x_0 \), because otherwise - if in each left neighborhood of \( x_0 \) there is an \( x \) with \( f(x)=1 \) - there is a sequence \( x_n\to x \) with \( f(x_n)=1 \) which means that \( \lim_{x\uparrow x_0}f(x) \) does not exist or is 1.
But if \( f(x)=0 \) in whole left neighborhood of \( x_0 \) then \( \lim_{x\downarrow x_1} f(x) = 0 \) for \( x_1 := x_0 - \frac{\delta}{2} \).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - by bo198214 - 06/03/2008, 03:21 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The modified Bennet Operators, and their Abel functions JmsNxn 6 10,216 07/22/2022, 12:55 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  the inverse ackerman functions JmsNxn 3 16,713 09/18/2016, 11:02 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 63,941 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Would there be new insights if hyperops are extended to functions? Ivars 2 11,908 05/12/2008, 09:41 AM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)