04/21/2023, 08:42 AM
(04/21/2023, 05:03 AM)JmsNxn Wrote: LMAO!so they all are correct, but hard to prove? Technically I don't need to demonstrate them if they already are in a theorem, which I'd need the name. But yeah if not I'll need to demonstrate them.
Yes this is true! See my post on your other thread!
GOOD JOB IDENTIFYING THIS!
This is a deep result, which appears more often in abel function analysis!
GOOD JOB!
You've rediscovered something that is unbelievably hard to prove!
![]()
![]()
![]()

