On extension to "other" iteration roots
#23
(08/15/2022, 07:47 AM)bo198214 Wrote:
(08/15/2022, 04:46 AM)JmsNxn Wrote: Let's say that \(z_0 = \inf_{z \in \mathbb{C}} \{|\Im(z_0)|\,|\, b^{z_0} = z_0\}\). Then within the shell thron region for \(b > e^{-e}\) the infimum is \(z_0\) and it is real valued. When you let \(b < e^{-e}\), the value \(z_0\) is split into fixed point pairs \(z_0^{\pm}\) where \(|\Im(z_0)|> 0\).

We really have a problem here. I thought from the picture I gave it was clear that there is no split at eta minor - it is a totally continuous behaviour regarding the fixed points. The \(\inf \{|\Im(z_0)|\,|\, b^{z_0} = z_0, z_0 \in \mathbb{C}\}\) is 0 because of the fixed point on the real line (in and out of the STR). I really have no clue what split you are referring to or what essentially changes in the fixed points when passing eta minor. Inside and outside we have one real fixed point and many conjugated fixed point pairs

I realized that that infimum appears meaningless.

There's a split in the sense that \(b^z\) no longer has an attracting fixed point on the real line; there is not a discontinuity in the Fixed points. The fixed points follow a continuous curve; I know this. There's no splitting of fixed points. I said they are not "primary"; and once you have \(b < \eta^-\), we no longer have an attracting fixed point on the real line. Okay, so to maintain real valued; we need our "primary" fixed point to be the up/down fixedpoints in the complex plane. And in doing such, we won't have the orbit about \(0\) in our image; so it won't have \(0,1,b,...\) in its image.

What I meant by "split" I meant: not a split in the continuity of the fixed points; there's a split in our choice of my words to describe what primary is. By which we don't have \(0,1,b\) in the orbit, but it is still a real valued super function.

I think I just misspoke one too many times and I keep digging a hole here. I'm happy to take the L, but when you switch from \(b > \eta^-\) to \(b < \eta^-\) there is a "split" which I used in my own internal language. I apologize bo, if I can appear thick.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: On extension to "other" iteration roots - by JmsNxn - 08/17/2022, 03:23 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  my proposed extension of the fast growing hierarchy to real numbers Alex Zuma 2025 0 1,612 09/28/2025, 07:15 PM
Last Post: Alex Zuma 2025
  possible tetration extension part 1 Shanghai46 6 10,543 10/31/2022, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Catullus
  possible tetration extension part 3 Shanghai46 11 16,643 10/28/2022, 07:11 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  possible tetration extension part 2 Shanghai46 8 11,228 10/18/2022, 09:14 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Qs on extension of continuous iterations from analytic functs to non-analytic Leo.W 18 27,685 09/18/2022, 09:37 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Tetration extension for bases between 1 and eta dantheman163 23 68,194 07/05/2022, 04:10 PM
Last Post: Leo.W
  Non-trivial extension of max(n,1)-1 to the reals and its iteration. MphLee 9 22,584 06/15/2022, 10:59 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Fractional iteration of x^2+1 at infinity and fractional iteration of exp bo198214 17 55,570 06/11/2022, 12:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Ueda - Extension of tetration to real and complex heights MphLee 4 9,082 05/08/2022, 11:48 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Possible continuous extension of tetration to the reals Dasedes 0 6,114 10/10/2016, 04:57 AM
Last Post: Dasedes



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)