07/20/2022, 11:38 PM
Oh I meant nothing against you Daniel.
Please don't feel personal slight against you. But it seems sometimes you think the only tetration is your tetration, and it can be frustrating. Where as mathematicians, we should be able to identify there are uncountably infinitely many tetrations. And this doesn't even include the smooth tetrations.
There is so much to iteration theory beyond the Bell polynomial approach. But you seem to write these off. It doesn't really bother me, until it appears you deny its existence. I have nothing but respect for you. If anything, I think you take criticisms a tad too personal.
I apologize if I went off and spoke badly towards you. That wasn't my intention. But I come from a family of stern hands and stern words. Smarten up and stand straight is a common tongue I know far too well.
I like having you here, and I like your questions, and I like your posts. I fucking love your fractals, and I respect your approach at mathematics. There is nothing there that I don't. I guess it seems that sometimes you don't understand what a Schroder function is, and therefore it doesn't exist. And that's very frustrating. I can, and just as well bo can, construct the bell polynomial approach, and unfortunately it uses mathematics that's been around for 50 - 100 years depending on who you reference. It can be frustrating from my perspective, when you deny that it's Schroder's method, when I can guarantee it is. And as mathematicians, ignorance is not an excuse. Maybe in the social sciences (oh I didn't read that article) that defense will work. Not in mathematics.
Again, nothing but respect for you, Daniel. I do not think you act like you're a sage, bo said that. I said holier than thou, and I apologize. I get now that may have been a tad disrespectful.But remember, in the wise words of my grade 11 math teacher who used to quote famous mathematicians from their personal letters.
These heated debates have been going on for ever. Let's change the tune. And to do that, we need to free ourselves from an emotional attachment to the mathematical object. The bell polynomials are fantastic, your work is very well done--but there are many upon many ways of constructing the same construction.
I hope I am not being aggressive or mean, that can come off from my language. I honestly don't have the energy for drama on the tetration forum. I get enough of that from the women in my life
Please don't feel personal slight against you. But it seems sometimes you think the only tetration is your tetration, and it can be frustrating. Where as mathematicians, we should be able to identify there are uncountably infinitely many tetrations. And this doesn't even include the smooth tetrations.
There is so much to iteration theory beyond the Bell polynomial approach. But you seem to write these off. It doesn't really bother me, until it appears you deny its existence. I have nothing but respect for you. If anything, I think you take criticisms a tad too personal.
I apologize if I went off and spoke badly towards you. That wasn't my intention. But I come from a family of stern hands and stern words. Smarten up and stand straight is a common tongue I know far too well.
I like having you here, and I like your questions, and I like your posts. I fucking love your fractals, and I respect your approach at mathematics. There is nothing there that I don't. I guess it seems that sometimes you don't understand what a Schroder function is, and therefore it doesn't exist. And that's very frustrating. I can, and just as well bo can, construct the bell polynomial approach, and unfortunately it uses mathematics that's been around for 50 - 100 years depending on who you reference. It can be frustrating from my perspective, when you deny that it's Schroder's method, when I can guarantee it is. And as mathematicians, ignorance is not an excuse. Maybe in the social sciences (oh I didn't read that article) that defense will work. Not in mathematics.
Again, nothing but respect for you, Daniel. I do not think you act like you're a sage, bo said that. I said holier than thou, and I apologize. I get now that may have been a tad disrespectful.But remember, in the wise words of my grade 11 math teacher who used to quote famous mathematicians from their personal letters.
Quote:You idiot! You don't even know what a hyperbola is! - Descartes, to some other mathematician
These heated debates have been going on for ever. Let's change the tune. And to do that, we need to free ourselves from an emotional attachment to the mathematical object. The bell polynomials are fantastic, your work is very well done--but there are many upon many ways of constructing the same construction.
I hope I am not being aggressive or mean, that can come off from my language. I honestly don't have the energy for drama on the tetration forum. I get enough of that from the women in my life