07/19/2022, 10:06 PM
I'm not sure I want to enter in this. I'd like to avoid my poor english to make things worse.
But I believe that there is just some sort of communication problem going on here, on both parts. A problem that cause both parts to add some salty lines here and there sometimes. Just this.
Daniel asked questions. It seems to me that in the past weeks Daniel realized better what were his weak points in approaching iteration and research in general. So he tried to ask some question and exit his comfort zone. Everyone has one and it is hard to get out of there. Obviously we are not pro mathematicians... so he tried to do this to the best of his possibilities asking question, asking help the most expert here to build a bridge from the place where he'd like to visit to his little village.
After that Gottfried, Bo and JmsNxn offered explanations, maybe not every one of them fully tuned with the speed and detail Daniel was ready for or in some way not perfectly tuned for him to understand and in a way that probably criticized the point of view adopted by Daniel in his research, with the best intentions, I believe.
Daniel then perceived that wrongly in part and in part felt his questions were avoided, it is natural that he felt he had to move to a more defensive position.
Bo and James perceived that as the sage attitude, but weren't really attacking Daniel personally imho.
Maybe all the parts are having small communication issues.
I believe all the actual forum members are way more humble than they seem to be, just be kind to each other
wish for the best.
But I believe that there is just some sort of communication problem going on here, on both parts. A problem that cause both parts to add some salty lines here and there sometimes. Just this.
Daniel asked questions. It seems to me that in the past weeks Daniel realized better what were his weak points in approaching iteration and research in general. So he tried to ask some question and exit his comfort zone. Everyone has one and it is hard to get out of there. Obviously we are not pro mathematicians... so he tried to do this to the best of his possibilities asking question, asking help the most expert here to build a bridge from the place where he'd like to visit to his little village.
After that Gottfried, Bo and JmsNxn offered explanations, maybe not every one of them fully tuned with the speed and detail Daniel was ready for or in some way not perfectly tuned for him to understand and in a way that probably criticized the point of view adopted by Daniel in his research, with the best intentions, I believe.
Daniel then perceived that wrongly in part and in part felt his questions were avoided, it is natural that he felt he had to move to a more defensive position.
Bo and James perceived that as the sage attitude, but weren't really attacking Daniel personally imho.
Maybe all the parts are having small communication issues.
I believe all the actual forum members are way more humble than they seem to be, just be kind to each other
wish for the best.
Mother Law \(\sigma^+\circ 0=\sigma \circ \sigma^+ \)
\({\rm Grp}_{\rm pt} ({\rm RK}J,G)\cong \mathbb N{\rm Set}_{\rm pt} (J, \Sigma^G)\)