10/24/2021, 02:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 10/26/2021, 06:17 AM by Ember Edison.)
Trial report of the last few days
1. The new beta_taylor is indeed very fast, but the problem is that at base=1E5, I*1E5, the new beta_taylor seems to be completely wrong.
Please check base=1E5, I*1E5, -1E5, and preferably accelerated to 1E13, 1E-13
(Now in the process of drawing 1E-5, it also seems abnormal)
2021/10/26: I retract my comment so as not to mislead the public. Fortunately, I wasn't too far off the mark.
2. beta(z), is very fast. but Sexp_N(z,20) is slow, so normalization can be as slow as about two hours, like old beta_taylor
3. normalization in Shell-Thron region 100% fail
I will not try this feature again and will focus on drawing
Although, intuitively the smaller the base the more it needs to be normalization, but the success rate is too low
Some of my changes
beta_20211025.gp (Size: 30.24 KB / Downloads: 649)
1. The new beta_taylor is indeed very fast, but the problem is that at base=1E5, I*1E5, the new beta_taylor seems to be completely wrong.
Please check base=1E5, I*1E5, -1E5, and preferably accelerated to 1E13, 1E-13
(Now in the process of drawing 1E-5, it also seems abnormal)
2021/10/26: I retract my comment so as not to mislead the public. Fortunately, I wasn't too far off the mark.
2. beta(z), is very fast. but Sexp_N(z,20) is slow, so normalization can be as slow as about two hours, like old beta_taylor
3. normalization in Shell-Thron region 100% fail
I will not try this feature again and will focus on drawing
Although, intuitively the smaller the base the more it needs to be normalization, but the success rate is too low
Some of my changes
beta_20211025.gp (Size: 30.24 KB / Downloads: 649)