I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2
|
I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2
|
Here's the code I've used for these functions. I've made it to about 10 digit precision. I've set the iterations to 100 by default. So we're looking for \( \mu_\lambda^{100} \). It works nearly flawlessly, still a little sketchy though.
Abel_half_T.zip (Size: 979 KB / Downloads: 617)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by JmsNxn - 09/25/2021, 02:47 AM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by JmsNxn - 09/25/2021, 07:11 AM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by JmsNxn - 09/26/2021, 10:47 PM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by JmsNxn - 09/29/2021, 01:43 AM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by Ember Edison - 09/29/2021, 04:44 PM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by JmsNxn - 09/30/2021, 03:04 AM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by JmsNxn - 09/30/2021, 05:38 AM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by Catullus - 06/20/2022, 03:48 AM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by JmsNxn - 06/20/2022, 07:16 AM
RE: I thought I'd take a crack at base = 1/2 - by Catullus - 06/20/2022, 08:28 AM
|
