05/22/2021, 12:24 PM
Ok sorry I was not clear enough.
A hair is a shape.
So for instance let tet(s) be analytic tetration.
a = tet(1 + i)
then consider for r > 0 : exp^[r](a).
this is a continu curve in the complex plane.
Now arctet(exp^[r](a)) = 1 + i + r.
This is a flat line with starting point 1 + i.
the SHAPE of that flat line with starting point 1 + i is a flat line starting at 1+i.
so the hair ( of exp^[r](a) with respect to tet(s) ) is this flat curve.
NOW FOR A GENERAL APPROXIMATION OF tetration f(s) we consider
hair = shape ( inverse_f(exp^[r](s_1)) ).
SO a hair is the shape (not the function and not the values of ) of h(s) where
f(h(s)) = exp(f(s)).
That is what I meant with : " If f(s) was exactly tetration those paths would be flat and parallel to eachother "
I hope this clarifies.
regards
tommy1729
A hair is a shape.
So for instance let tet(s) be analytic tetration.
a = tet(1 + i)
then consider for r > 0 : exp^[r](a).
this is a continu curve in the complex plane.
Now arctet(exp^[r](a)) = 1 + i + r.
This is a flat line with starting point 1 + i.
the SHAPE of that flat line with starting point 1 + i is a flat line starting at 1+i.
so the hair ( of exp^[r](a) with respect to tet(s) ) is this flat curve.
NOW FOR A GENERAL APPROXIMATION OF tetration f(s) we consider
hair = shape ( inverse_f(exp^[r](s_1)) ).
SO a hair is the shape (not the function and not the values of ) of h(s) where
f(h(s)) = exp(f(s)).
That is what I meant with : " If f(s) was exactly tetration those paths would be flat and parallel to eachother "
I hope this clarifies.
regards
tommy1729

