Is bugs or features for fatou.gp super-logarithm?
#7
(08/02/2019, 09:34 PM)sheldonison Wrote: ……

[edit1] The theta mapping for these bases greater than exp(-e) seems poorly behaved and requires a larger number of coefficients to converge than one might expect.  It would be nice to better understand the theta mapping and its radius of convergence for base=0.15, and its nearest singularity.  For B=0.1+I*E-30; I needed 250 terms in the theta mapping! matrix_ir(B,400,250,14/15,45/46) to get a bit over 16 decimal digits of precision as compared with 90 terms for B=0.15 matrix_ir(0.15,400,90,14/15,45/46).  Either way, where is the nearest singularity in the theta function?  I also don't know why I needed the small imaginary offset for B=0.1; otherwise the Schroeder function to Abel function conversion gets confused, but I don't know why.

[edit2] The Schroeder function for neutral points does not converge if the period is a rational number.  So a period=4 Schroeder function doesn't exist since it doesn't converge.  But if the period is a well behaved irrational number (with imaginary part=0) then the Schroeder function does converge.  For example, a period=pi Schroeder function does converge.  See 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brjuno_number, and http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Sieg...egel_disks.  The Kneser Tetration and its inverse are analytic even if the period is rational.  The experiment is to look at all of the Taylor series coefficients of the slog and see how they vary as the base changes in the complex plane.  There is an analytic function for each of these Taylor series coefficients.  So from the bases around the rational base, one can construct an arbitrarily accurate series even though the fatou.gp algorithm isn't ideal for computation of such neutral rational period bases.
The last edit it's sounds strange. So Will the Kneser Tetration and its inverse can exist if Schroeder function doesn't exist? 
The base = E^-E is a singularity?

And Can you get more digital evidence to "proof" add small imaginary will not add side effects?

Ps: As long as the fatou.gp be faster, I can accept more memory usage. 2GB is good, but I can accept >10GB if you can really speed up (but I don't think you can lot).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: For Ember ... fatou.gp boundary conditions and how it works - by Ember Edison - 08/04/2019, 12:55 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Mixed-base tetration: five preprints, a faster fatou.gp fork, and a base-change calcu Lightrunner 0 343 07/15/2026, 08:33 AM
Last Post: Lightrunner
  Illustrating the Leau-Fatou flowers bo198214 14 20,078 10/23/2022, 07:09 PM
Last Post: MphLee
Question Derivative of the Tetration Logarithm Catullus 1 3,850 07/03/2022, 07:23 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Iterated Hyperbolic Sine and Iterated Natural Logarithm Catullus 2 5,620 06/11/2022, 11:58 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 37,149 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 43,983 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 17,595 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 7,118 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The super of exp(z)(z^2 + 1) + z. tommy1729 1 8,697 03/15/2016, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Super-root 3 andydude 10 38,147 01/19/2016, 03:14 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)