08/14/2018, 10:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 08/15/2018, 12:45 AM by sheldonison.)
(08/14/2018, 08:34 PM)Chenjesu Wrote: The claim in the paper J.N. paper appears to be that any complex height z can be represented with a standard analytic series and integral...Why are you so focused on nit-picking one unpublished paper? I have listed peer reviewed published papers and books, applicable to solutions of \( \exp_b^{[\circ z]}(1) \). I'm not saying James Nixon's paper is incorrect, I'm just saying it isn't relevant given that you are interested in peer reviewed rigorous work.
- Dr. William Paulson's two recent papers
- Henryk Trapmann's Uniqueness paper
- Lennart Carleson's book "Complex Dynamics"
- By indirect extension Kneser's 1950 paper
- Sheldon