Look.
Let f(z') = e - 0,2.
F(z') ~ exp^[1/2] ~ 2sinh^[1/2]
So 1 < z ' < e - 0,2.
Within radius 0,1 around z = z' :
| exp(f(z)) - f(exp(z)) | =< e^e
And
| exp(exp(f(z))) - f(exp(exp(z))) | =< e^e^e.
So
Ln | exp(f(z)) - f(exp(z)) | =< e.
And
Ln ln | exp( exp(f(z)) ) - f(exp(exp(z))) | =< e.
By induction we get
+1+
Ln^[n] | exp^[n] (f(z)) - f(exp^[n](z)) | < e + 1.
Therefore the m-test gives for +1+ : | m_1 | + | m_2 | + ... < e + 1.
Notice if | f(exp^[n](z)) | >= | exp^[n](f(z)) |
Then
Ln^[n] | 2 f(exp^[n](z)) | < e + 1 + ln(2).
So in this case the m-test for 2 sinh gives An upper bound :
| s1 | + |s2| + ... < e + 1 + ln(2).
So the m-test has passed it as analytic.
****
Easy to generalize to e' > e and f(z '' ) = ~ e'.
And a radius 0,1 / e^(e^e').
****
Easy to show that it holds at infinity too.
****
Regards
Tommy1729
Let f(z') = e - 0,2.
F(z') ~ exp^[1/2] ~ 2sinh^[1/2]
So 1 < z ' < e - 0,2.
Within radius 0,1 around z = z' :
| exp(f(z)) - f(exp(z)) | =< e^e
And
| exp(exp(f(z))) - f(exp(exp(z))) | =< e^e^e.
So
Ln | exp(f(z)) - f(exp(z)) | =< e.
And
Ln ln | exp( exp(f(z)) ) - f(exp(exp(z))) | =< e.
By induction we get
+1+
Ln^[n] | exp^[n] (f(z)) - f(exp^[n](z)) | < e + 1.
Therefore the m-test gives for +1+ : | m_1 | + | m_2 | + ... < e + 1.
Notice if | f(exp^[n](z)) | >= | exp^[n](f(z)) |
Then
Ln^[n] | 2 f(exp^[n](z)) | < e + 1 + ln(2).
So in this case the m-test for 2 sinh gives An upper bound :
| s1 | + |s2| + ... < e + 1 + ln(2).
So the m-test has passed it as analytic.
****
Easy to generalize to e' > e and f(z '' ) = ~ e'.
And a radius 0,1 / e^(e^e').
****
Easy to show that it holds at infinity too.
****
Regards
Tommy1729

