Derivative of exp^[1/2] at the fixed point?
#6
I wanted to post what I've found out so far; which is not complete, and explain why only four derivatives are defined for Kneser's half iterate at the fixed point of L. First, let S(z) be the Schroeder function, \( \alpha(z) \) is the Abel function, and \( h_f \) be the formal half iterate which is not real valued at the real axis.
\( h_f(z) = S^{-1}(\sqrt{L}\cdot S(z)) \)
\( h_f(z) = \alpha^{-1}(\alpha(z)+0.5) = S^{-1}\left(L^{0.5 + \log_L(S(z))}\right) \)

Then let \( h_k \) be the real valued Kneser half iterate. Here's the closest I've gotten, where \( \theta_h(z) \) is a new 1-cyclic function whose coefficients can be derived from the 1-cyclic \( \theta(z) \) mapping used for the \( \text{sexp}(z)=\alpha^{-1}(z+\theta(z)) \).

\( h_k(z) = \alpha^{-1}(\alpha(z)+0.5) = S^{-1}\left(L^{0.5 + \log_L(S(z))+\theta_h\left(\log_L(S(z))\right)}\right)\;\; \)
The constant term \( a_0=0 \) for \( \theta_h(z) \), so that \( \;\theta_h(z)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n \cdot \exp(2n\pi i)\;\; \)
\( h_k(z) = S^{-1} \left(\sqrt{L} \cdot S(z) \cdot L^{\theta_h\left(\log_L(S(z))\right)}\right)\;\; \)

Since \( S(z)=(z-L)+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}a_n\cdot(z-L)^n=(z-L)\left(1+\cdot\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n+1}\cdot(z-L)^{n}\right) \), then the
\( \log_L(S(z)) = \log_L(z-L) + \log_L\left( 1+\cdot\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n+1}\cdot(z-L)^{n}\right)\;\; \), a taylor series in (z-L).
So what we have for the individual theta(z) terms is
\( \exp\left(2n\pi i \cdot \log_L(z-L) \right) \cdot \left( \sum_{m=0}^{\infty}b_{nm}\cdot(z-L)^{m}\right)

\approx (z-L)^{(4.44695n+1.05794ni)} \cdot \left(\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}b_{nm}\cdot(z-L)^{m}\right) \)
\( p = \frac{2\pi i}{L} \approx 4.44695+1.05794i\;\; \) p is the pseudo period of sexp

\( L^{\theta_h\left(\log_L(S(z))\right)}= 1 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(c_n \cdot (z-L)^{np} + c_{n1}\cdot(z-L)^{np+1} + c_{n2}\cdot(z-L)^{np+2} ... \right) \;\;\; \) multiplier for S(z); also a function of (z-L)

\( h_k(z) = h(z) +\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \sum_{m=0}^{\infty}d_{nm}\cdot(z-L)^{np+m} \right) \;\;\; \) update I think this is a complete form for the Kneser half iterate.

I left out many details including all of details about how to derive \( \theta_h(z) \) from \( \theta(z) \). I haven't yet used these equation to calculate values for Kneser's half iterate in terms of the formal half iterate, and verify they match the expected values generated through other means. But the first 4 derivatives are zero at L, and the 5th derivative of \( \approx k \cdot (z-L)^{(4.44695+1.05794i )} \) has a singularity at L. That's all for now; next I would like to calculate some of the \( d_{10}, d_{11}, d_{12} \) terms to test this equation out.
- Sheldon
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Derivative of exp^[1/2] at the fixed point? - by sheldonison - 12/29/2015, 10:25 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Down with fixed points! Daniel 1 2,754 04/29/2023, 11:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  CONCLUSION 1 : conditions for nice tetration : second derivative !! tommy1729 6 6,889 02/23/2023, 12:56 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Iteration with two analytic fixed points bo198214 62 71,998 11/27/2022, 06:53 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question The Different Fixed Points of Exponentials Catullus 22 24,706 07/24/2022, 12:22 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Quick way to get the repelling fixed point from the attracting fixed point? JmsNxn 10 12,962 07/22/2022, 01:51 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Apropos "fix"point: are the fractional iterations from there "fix" as well? Gottfried 12 15,120 07/19/2022, 03:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
Question Two Attracting Fixed Points Catullus 4 6,635 07/04/2022, 01:04 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question Derivative of the Tetration Logarithm Catullus 1 3,240 07/03/2022, 07:23 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  On the first derivative of the n-th tetration of f(x) Luknik 5 8,664 10/28/2021, 11:53 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tetration from alternative fixed point sheldonison 22 88,063 12/24/2019, 06:26 AM
Last Post: Daniel



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)