Set theory debate : cantor 1st / Virgil argument.
#2
By analogue we can show any open interval with endpoint 2 consecutive integers contains infinitely many fractions.

This SUGGESTS that there is no bijection from integers to fractions.
But there is.
This proof strategy fails.

Regards

Tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Set theory debate : cantor 1st / Virgil argument. - by tommy1729 - 12/08/2015, 11:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [UFO] "commutative number theory " f(g) = g(f) tommy1729 0 2,389 03/24/2023, 11:36 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  geometric function theory ideas tommy1729 0 2,943 12/31/2022, 12:19 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Trying to get Kneser from beta; the modular argument JmsNxn 2 4,766 03/29/2022, 06:34 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  " x-theory " tommy1729 1 4,017 08/12/2021, 12:17 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Dynamical Systems and Number Theory Daniel 4 9,505 06/01/2021, 11:34 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Is bounded tetration is analytic in the base argument? JmsNxn 0 5,653 01/02/2017, 06:38 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  [2015] Spiderweb theory tommy1729 0 6,159 03/29/2015, 06:25 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [number theory] sieving with a_i mod p_i tommy1729 7 25,935 09/12/2014, 07:28 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  " fake ring theory " tommy1729 0 6,166 06/11/2014, 11:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [Number Theory] pi(X,x,x+2)+pi(X,x,x+4) tommy1729 1 7,952 04/11/2014, 10:33 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)