11/26/2015, 11:56 PM
There are many ways to solve f(f(x)) = exp(x) or g(g(x)) = 2sinh(x).
If g < f then g is uniquely so.
Also using the 2sinh method on g gives us f.
NOTICE it is impossible to directly solve for g in the 2sinh method.
So we must use g < f.
This implies a bijection between g and f , by the 2sinh or equivalently the inequality.
Since there exist both analytic half iterates for both 2sinh and exp , for Every f there is a g and vice versa , we get the next BIG conclusion ;
There MUST exist analytic solution of type 2sinh method.
---
That is nice.
But one wonders if f and g related as above must
1) both be analytic or both not.
?
In other words is the bijection actually univalent ?
I kinda repeat myself , but I assumed it belongs here better , and it was not understood by most.
Regards
tommy1729
If g < f then g is uniquely so.
Also using the 2sinh method on g gives us f.
NOTICE it is impossible to directly solve for g in the 2sinh method.
So we must use g < f.
This implies a bijection between g and f , by the 2sinh or equivalently the inequality.
Since there exist both analytic half iterates for both 2sinh and exp , for Every f there is a g and vice versa , we get the next BIG conclusion ;
There MUST exist analytic solution of type 2sinh method.
---
That is nice.
But one wonders if f and g related as above must
1) both be analytic or both not.
?
In other words is the bijection actually univalent ?
I kinda repeat myself , but I assumed it belongs here better , and it was not understood by most.
Regards
tommy1729

