Since the beginning of this thread i noticed a problem that has not been adressed.
The problem occurs with all methods.
I mentioned it but I guess it was not clear enough.
Maybe because I anticipated the problem before we had the actual methods.
So now that we have a dozen methods or so , it is time to bring it Up again.
This might also explain why MSE and MO users are ignoring this ( mick's Posts ).
In a way it resembles irrationality issues ; the irrationallity of a Sum of fractions is independant of the first n fractions. And by induction n+1 and by further induction ... You get the idea.
This looks cryptic so
Lets give the clarifying example :
Fake ( exp^[1/2] + 10 x) is off by a factor n^10 or n^10.5 depending on the method used.
Check it yourself.
Fake ( exp(x) + x^2 ) is even worse.
Regards
Tommy1729
-----
This appears to be a mistake and is considered for delete !
The problem occurs with all methods.
I mentioned it but I guess it was not clear enough.
Maybe because I anticipated the problem before we had the actual methods.
So now that we have a dozen methods or so , it is time to bring it Up again.
This might also explain why MSE and MO users are ignoring this ( mick's Posts ).
In a way it resembles irrationality issues ; the irrationallity of a Sum of fractions is independant of the first n fractions. And by induction n+1 and by further induction ... You get the idea.
This looks cryptic so
Lets give the clarifying example :
Fake ( exp^[1/2] + 10 x) is off by a factor n^10 or n^10.5 depending on the method used.
Check it yourself.
Fake ( exp(x) + x^2 ) is even worse.
Regards
Tommy1729
-----
This appears to be a mistake and is considered for delete !
