12/04/2014, 01:20 PM
Doner and Tarski can not define exp^[1/2](w) and its cardinality , right ?
Do Doner and Tarski give a different answer to 2^^w ?
I still challenge to give exp^[1/2](w) even under the assumption that ZFC is good.
Sorry for going a bit offtopic.
Guess I have emotional Luggage concerning this.
Im not 100% constructivist for clarity.
regards
tommy1729
Do Doner and Tarski give a different answer to 2^^w ?
I still challenge to give exp^[1/2](w) even under the assumption that ZFC is good.
Sorry for going a bit offtopic.
Guess I have emotional Luggage concerning this.
Im not 100% constructivist for clarity.
regards
tommy1729
