11/03/2014, 10:49 PM
I noticed Q9 must give about the same result as S9 for the exp(x) in the sense that
There exists fixed positive real constants A,B such that
A < S9(n)/Q9(n) < B
for all positive integer n.
[ S9(n) is the sheldon post 9 estimate of a_n and Q9(n) is my Q9 estimate of a_n ]
Therefore it seems intuitive to conjecture
The SQ conjecture :
A < S9(n)/Q9(n) < B
where the fixed positive real values A,B only depend on the function considered.
***
I wonder what S9 and Q9 give for the J(x) function.
( the J(x) function that estimates the binary partition function discussed before ... J for Jay D fox )
If there exists a counterexample to the SQ conjecture that is entire , then it probably has to do alot with convergeance speed.
regards
tommy1729
There exists fixed positive real constants A,B such that
A < S9(n)/Q9(n) < B
for all positive integer n.
[ S9(n) is the sheldon post 9 estimate of a_n and Q9(n) is my Q9 estimate of a_n ]
Therefore it seems intuitive to conjecture
The SQ conjecture :
A < S9(n)/Q9(n) < B
where the fixed positive real values A,B only depend on the function considered.
***
I wonder what S9 and Q9 give for the J(x) function.
( the J(x) function that estimates the binary partition function discussed before ... J for Jay D fox )
If there exists a counterexample to the SQ conjecture that is entire , then it probably has to do alot with convergeance speed.
regards
tommy1729

