09/02/2014, 07:46 AM
I told mick to consider fake( f ) = fake( f g )/ g.
Or perhaps even fake ( f ) = fake ( f g ) / fake ( g ).
That seems like a powerfull idea at first sight.
So fake ( ln(x^2+1) ) = fake ( ln (x^2+1) exp(x^2) ) exp(-x^2).
Naturally I wonder now about
fake ( exp^[0.5](x) ) vs fake ( exp^[0.5](x) exp(x) ) exp(-x).
I assume we cannot keep the property of positive derivatives for
fake ( exp^[0.5](x) exp(x) ) exp(-x) , but still it seems intresting.
Also crossing my mind : d/dx fake ( f ) = fake ( d/dx f ).
And then there are least squares ideas.
A theoretical question : Lets write fake+ for an asymptotic with positive derivatives,
then does there Always exist a g(x) such that for any entire f(x) we have
fake+ ( f ) = fake+ ( f g ) / g
?
regards
tommy1729
Or perhaps even fake ( f ) = fake ( f g ) / fake ( g ).
That seems like a powerfull idea at first sight.
So fake ( ln(x^2+1) ) = fake ( ln (x^2+1) exp(x^2) ) exp(-x^2).
Naturally I wonder now about
fake ( exp^[0.5](x) ) vs fake ( exp^[0.5](x) exp(x) ) exp(-x).
I assume we cannot keep the property of positive derivatives for
fake ( exp^[0.5](x) exp(x) ) exp(-x) , but still it seems intresting.
Also crossing my mind : d/dx fake ( f ) = fake ( d/dx f ).
And then there are least squares ideas.
A theoretical question : Lets write fake+ for an asymptotic with positive derivatives,
then does there Always exist a g(x) such that for any entire f(x) we have
fake+ ( f ) = fake+ ( f g ) / g
?
regards
tommy1729

