Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ?
#1
Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ?

Is that a uniqueness condition ?

The difference between univalent and pseudounivalent is :

speudounivalent is weaker : f(z+k) = f(z) only possible if k is real.

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ? - by tommy1729 - 03/25/2014, 12:46 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Two types of tetration : sexp ' > or < 1. tommy1729 3 8,365 10/17/2023, 12:06 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question When Does \(\displaystyle\int_{-1}^0\text{sexp}(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\) Equal \(\frac12\)? Catullus 0 2,947 10/31/2022, 11:47 PM
Last Post: Catullus
  Revitalizing an old idea : estimated fake sexp'(x) = F3(x) tommy1729 0 3,197 02/27/2022, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 6,196 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 13,461 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  pseudo2periodic sexp. tommy1729 0 6,034 06/27/2014, 10:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 9,737 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Multiple exp^[1/2](z) by same sexp ? tommy1729 12 45,073 05/06/2014, 10:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 30,694 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Vincent's theorem and sin(sexp) ? tommy1729 0 5,924 03/22/2014, 11:46 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)